Change text size
A-
A
A+
 
Choose your language:
en
 
 

In this section

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2002 Special Meeting

Final press release from the International Whaling Commission's Special meeting in Cambridge, UK 2002

On this page

Iceland Iceland's membership of the Commission
Catch limits Catch limits for aboriginal subsistence whaling
Japan Interim relief allocation for Japanese coastal whaling
Iceland's reservation The instrument of adherence
Further details Link to page with further details of the issue regarding Iceland's membership
Chair's Report Link to page containing the Chair's Report of the 2002 Special Meeting (pdf)

 


2002 SPECIAL MEETING

Cambridge, UK

The Special Meeting took place on 14 October 2002 at the DeVere University Arms Hotel, Cambridge, UK, under the Chairmanship of Prof. Bo Fernholm (Sweden).

The primary purpose of the meeting was to reconsider the issue of catch limits for the aboriginal subsistence catch of bowhead whales. No new limits had been agreed at the 54th Annual Meeting. In addition it had been agreed to include an item on an interim relief allocation for Japanese coastal whaling. This had also been on the agenda of the 54th Annual meeting (and a number of previous meetings).

 


Icelandic membership

As at the last two Annual Meetings, the major item discussed in the morning concerned the adherence of Iceland to the Convention with a reservation to Paragraph 10(e). That paragraph refers to what is popularly termed the ‘moratorium’ on commercial whaling. (For the full terms of the reservation submitted by Iceland, click HERE. For further details of this issue, click HERE).

There was again a difference of views as to whether the Commission should accept Iceland’s reservation. After a series of procedural votes, the Commission agreed by 19 votes to 18, that Iceland is a member of the Commission.

 


Catch limits for aboriginal subsistence whaling

At the 54th meeting, despite (i) agreement by the Scientific Committee that the bowhead whale stock was able to sustain the harvest, and (ii) acknowledgement of the cultural, nutritional and subsistence needs of both Alaskan Eskimos and native peoples of Chukotka, a proposal to continue to include provision for such catches failed to reach the necessary three-quarters majority (32 votes were in favour, 11 against and 2 abstentions). The reason given by some of the 11 countries who voted no was that they believed Japan should also be allocated subsistence whales for four coastal whaling villages. They also referred to their belief that there was some scientific uncertainty about the ability of the bowhead stock to sustain the requested levels.

At the Special Meeting, a proposal allowing up to 280 bowhead whales to be landed in the period 2003 - 2007, with no more than 67 whales struck in any year (and up to 15 unused strikes may be carried over each year), was accepted by consensus. It contains a proviso that this be reviewed in the light of the Scientific Committee's work at the 2004 meeting and beyond.

 


Interim relief allocation for Japanese coastal whaling

This issue has been discussed by the Commission for the last 15 years. It concerns the possible allocation of a catch of 50 minke whales annually to four Japanese coastal communities until the Commission has finalised a Revised Management Scheme. A draft resolution was proposed by Japan intended to forward discussions on the issue and arrive expeditiously at a solution. It was defeated by 19 votes to 16 with 2 abstentions.

Top


Iceland's reservation

The instrument of adherence states, in translation, that Iceland:

“adheres to the aforesaid Convention and Protocol with a reservation with respect to paragraph 10(e) of the Schedule attached to the Convention.”

The instrument further states the following:

Notwithstanding this, the Government of Iceland will not authorize whaling for commercial purposes by Icelandic vessels before 2006 and, thereafter, will not authorize such whaling while progress is being made in negotiations within the International Whaling Commission on the Revised Management Scheme. This does not apply, however, in case of the so-called moratorium on whaling for commercial purposes, contained in paragraph 10 (e) of the Schedule, not being lifted within reasonable time after the completion of the Revised Management Scheme.

Under no circumstances will whaling for commercial purposes be authorized in Iceland without a sound scientific basis and an effective management and enforcement scheme.

The instrument of adherence also states that the reservation is an integral part of the instrument.